Land Court Blocks Mirgewood Drive Access for Controversial Canton Avenue Development

Key Points

  • Land Court rules against developers of 648-652 Canton Avenue regarding Mirgewood Drive access
  • Memory Care project to contribute $300,000 for town conservation and neighborhood efforts
  • Commission issues $300 fine for unauthorized tree cutting and construction at 45 Riverside Avenue
  • Site visits scheduled for March 28 to review drainage and flood zone concerns at multiple properties
  • Town seeks state grant for Unquity Brook bio-retention systems with match from NepRWA

The long-running legal battle over a proposed development at 648-652 Canton Avenue reached a significant milestone this week as the Land Court ruled against the applicant’s plan to utilize Mirgewood Drive. Chair John Kiernan announced the decision during Tuesday’s Conservation Commission meeting, noting the court found the proposed access would overburden the easement on the private way. The developers must now reconfigure their plans to provide access directly from Canton Avenue, marking a victory for neighbors who have long opposed the project's impact on the local infrastructure. Meanwhile, the town is still awaiting a decision regarding the turf field litigation at Lower Gile Road.

The Commission is also preparing to manage a significant influx of community funds related to the local Memory Care project. Kiernan reported that the developers are contributing $300,000 to the town, a sum the Commission hopes to leverage through the Community Preservation Act committee. We need to coordinate to build a nest egg for buying land or conservation restrictions, Kiernan said, adding that the Commission must ensure the neighborhood is involved before tree clearing begins this summer. Wendy Garpow noted the importance of active leadership in these efforts, stating, I'd like someone to replace me as the liaison to the Open Space Committee if the group successfully rejuvenates its inventory work.

Property owners at 45 Riverside Avenue faced immediate financial penalties for unauthorized work within the Commission's jurisdiction. Following a soft approach that yielded no results, the board upheld a $300 fine and an enforcement order for brush cutting and construction performed without a permit. Representative Yun New explained that the property owner doesn't speak English and just came to the country; he didn't know the law. New added that the owner cut the tree across the street because it was dead and he didn't want it to fall. Kiernan maintained that the owner must now file a retroactive Notice of Intent and replace any trees removed. If he cut a 9-inch tree, he replaces 9 inches of new trees, Kiernan explained.

Environmental concerns dominated the review of a new four-bedroom home proposed for 1386 Canton Avenue. The plan involves converting an existing house into an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) and adding a significant amount of impervious surface. Engineer Greg explained that the septic leach field would remain outside the 100-foot buffer, but Commission members pressed for more detail on the building’s footprint. Garpow asked the applicant to explain how the existing house meets the standards for an ADU, suggesting the plan appeared to claim main house space within the secondary structure to meet size requirements. Kiernan warned that the 8,410 square feet of impervious space requires strict runoff calculations. If you're putting more water into the wetlands, we need to know the flow rate, he said, reminding the applicant that the town charges a $700 per tree fee into a conservation fund for any trees that cannot be replaced on-site. Motion Made by J. Kiernan to continue the hearing to March 28, 2026, for a site visit. Motion Passed (6-0-0).

A proposed driveway and single-family home on Randolph Avenue (Parcels 114-112) drew scrutiny regarding a raised pathway located near a certified vernal pool. Engineer Ryan confirmed the pathway is a paved-to-gravel transition, while Brian Madden of LEC Environmental clarified that the 2.5-foot path is an unauthorized cut-through that the applicant does not intend to modify. Thomas Palmer expressed concern about the site’s topography, stating, I'm nervous about improvements along this right-of-way... It seems engineered to dump a lot of water along the driveway. Charles Bosworth suggested a belt and suspenders engineering approach, noting, You could put a simple gutter inlet around elevation 138 on the edge of the driveway and pitch the driveway toward that inlet. Motion Made by J. Kiernan to continue the hearing to March 28, 2026, for a site visit. Motion Passed (6-0-0).

Flooding risks on Riverside Avenue led the Commission to delay a decision on a 52-by-17-foot garage addition at number 51. Builder Kyle Martyr noted the 884-square-foot addition would sit on an existing driveway, but members pointed out that the site falls within a sensitive flood zone. Consider moving the addition further back to get it out of the flood zone, Garpow advised, noting it would save the owners a lot in insurance premiums. Bosworth requested the footprint be staked out for a site visit to determine the net increase in impervious surface. Motion Made by J. Kiernan to continue the hearing to March 28, 2026, for a site visit. Motion Passed (6-0-0).

The Commission ended the meeting by voting to support a Coastal Zone Management grant application for bio-retention systems in the Unquity Brook watershed. Garpow explained the grant requires no town funds, as the Neponset River Watershed Association (NepRWA) will provide the necessary match. Motion Made by W. Garpow to sign the draft letter of support for the bio-retention cell grant. Motion Passed (6-0-0). Discussion also touched on the potential revival of the Norfolk County Conservation District. Arthur Doyle noted he had asked MACC if they could make a presentation to inform us about the district's role in farmland restoration, though Palmer questioned how helpful county boundaries are for this work.